Talk:PRO-CT0: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why is it printed "SNK-9201" on the PROG boards of fatfury2 and ssideki, then ? Would the chip have a mode select pin ? --[[User:Furrtek|Furrtek]] 17:50, 16 March 2012 (CET) | Why is it printed "SNK-9201" on the PROG boards of fatfury2 and ssideki, then ? Would the chip have a mode select pin ? --[[User:Furrtek|Furrtek]] 17:50, 16 March 2012 (CET) | ||
Wait, seeing your pinout of PRO-CT0... Would they have dared using the logic of a video-dedicated chip to make a challenge-response kind of thing ? Checking if it would match what fatfury2 sends/expects right now, if my schematic of PRO-CT0 is right. --[[User:Furrtek|Furrtek]] 17:54, 16 March 2012 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:54, 16 March 2012
The SNK-9201 could have been misprinted, but I'm thinking the SNK-9201 *IS* a PRO-CT0 character multiplexer. The GAL acronym typically stands for "generic array logic", the SPLD. This would be either a "gate array", "uncommitted logic array" or "semi-custom ASIC --Kyuusaku 20:54, 15 March 2012 (CET)
Why is it printed "SNK-9201" on the PROG boards of fatfury2 and ssideki, then ? Would the chip have a mode select pin ? --Furrtek 17:50, 16 March 2012 (CET)
Wait, seeing your pinout of PRO-CT0... Would they have dared using the logic of a video-dedicated chip to make a challenge-response kind of thing ? Checking if it would match what fatfury2 sends/expects right now, if my schematic of PRO-CT0 is right. --Furrtek 17:54, 16 March 2012 (CET)